We begin today’s Irregular Roundup with CGT
For the FT, Sam Fleming revealed that capital gains tax (CGT) is only paid by a small share of the UK population. The second half of this was a little bit too much of “other people’s money” even for the FT, and it was quickly removed. Less than 3 per cent of UK adults are receiving cancer treatment, suggesting it could be withdrawn painlessly. The FT doubled down on class envy with a map showing that gains are geographically concentrated (in rich areas). More gains were received by residents in a part of Notting Hill in London than in Liverpool, Manchester and Newcastle combined, the research [by the University of Warwick and London School of Economics] showed. And they are mostly paid by rich people: Just 0.3 per cent of people with income under £50,000 had taxable gains in an average year, the report said. By contrast, almost 40 per cent of taxpayers with incomes over £5mn received some gains. More than half of all taxable gains in 2020 went to just 5,000 people, who received an average of more than £6.8mn per person in gains. 70 per cent of gains were from business assets. There are three obvious points: The Economist noted that dividends are back in the US, at least for Meta, who announced on its 20th anniversary that it would start paying one (alongside more stock buy-backs). This small payment represents a change of direction: Since the early 1990s, regular cash payments to shareholders have been in retreat, losing out to stock buy-backs. Managers love buy-backs because they cut the number of shares on the market, lifting earnings per share—and thus often executive compensation, too. Buybacks are good for investors, too as capital gains tend to have a better tax treatment than income (and are easier to time). So why the change? Daniel Peris of Federated Hermes, an investment house, and author of a new book, “The Ownership Dividend”, puts the decline of cash payments down to decades of falling
Investors can put income to work. Many are enjoying respectable, risk-free returns in money-market funds. Higher risk-free rates also lower the value of future earnings meaning some investors will prefer cash in hand today to higher stock prices tomorrow. Higher rates also make it harder to find reinvestment opportunities for profits and make issuing debt to fund buybacks less attractive. But
A firm that issues a dividend is signalling that it has confidence in its future cash flows, since shareholders often assume Life X annuities
For Morningstar, Amy Arnott looked at the LifeX funds from Stone Ridge Asset Management, a product similar to an
LifeX promises to solve this problem by offering steady monthly payouts up until an individual reaches age 100. That’s around 15 years past my life expectancy, and an age I have just a 3.3% chance of reaching (according to the ONS calculator). Each fund is targeted to a specific age and gender cohort, with birth years currently ranging from 1948 to 1963. Each age and gender cohort is available in two versions: a standard one with flat payouts and an inflation-adjusted version. So I am covered, as no doubt people my age are the target market for
The LifeX funds have one obvious drawback: a 1% expense ratio. Given that their underlying holdings are simple portfolios made up of Treasury bonds or Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, it’s tough to justify a fee that high. You can say that again – 1% on an underlying yield of currently 4.3% is pretty scandalous. This week’s update from the Hipgnosis (SONG) saga is that the fund is now suing its manager (Hipgnosis Song Management, HSM) and its founder (Merck Mercuriadis) in the hope of gaining an indemnity from another legal action. Mercuradis and HSM say the case is without merit, but SONG doesn’t want to be stuck with any costs. This week’s Election Watch update centres on reports that Labour remain committed to the state pension triple lock, hoping to secure the votes of older citizens. The triple lock can sometimes generate resentment, but the underlying issue is that the state pension is very low compared to average earnings. The issue is that funding a decent pension means that as the worker-to-pensioner ratio falls (as life expectancy increases) you need to increase the age at which people receive the cash. The fix is workplace pensions and the idea that between work and state you have sufficient income. Things should work out in another 25 to 30 years, but how do we get to that point? For the FT, Dan McCrum reported that the FCA has decided not to prosecute the executives involved in the Globo fraud back in 2015. Globo was an Aim-quoted provider of mobile phone software that collapsed in 2015 after short seller Gabriel Grego and FT Alphaville revealed that claimed business partners and resellers had never heard of the company. One turned out to be a laptop repair shop in Mumbai. Greece refuses to extradite the two men involved and they have been acquitted in a local trial. In 2018 the Financial Reporting Council decided not to take action against Grant Thornton over its Globo audits. Grego’s New York hedge fund Quintessential Capital Management had accused Globo of “massively overstating its revenue and profit by generating fictitious sales invoices from shell companies [posing as] legitimate clients. It was big news on the AIM bulletin boards at the time, and some private investors (including Paul Scott from Stockopedia) also flagged up the potential fraud. Globo raised £100M from investors and was once valued at £300M. White-collar crime would appear to pay. I have four for you this week: Until next time.
State Pension
Globo
Quick Links